The receiver array of matched field processing usually needs to cover the whole water column, such a large arrangement of array hinders its application seriously. To overcome this shortcoming, an approach called matched field processing based on least squares algorithm is proposed, which decomposes the received fields into depth function matrixes and amplitudes of normal mode at the beginning. Then all the mode amplitudes are estimated using the least squares in the sense of minimum norm. Next, the amplitudes estimated are used to reconstruct the received fields of the short vertical linear array, which makes the reconstructed ones contain more environmental information, therefore the performance of matched field processing with short array is improved. In the end, lots of simulations with three short vertical arrays which are located near by water surface are processed in the classical Pekeris waveguide, and the performance of matched field passive localization is evaluated. Meanwhile, in order to quantify the influence of different kinds of geometrical arrangements to the received fields, the generalized cosine-squared between two vectors is used. The results show that when the received fields of short array are reconstructed using the least squares, the generalized cosine-squared is larger obviously, finally the performance of matched field passive localization with short array is improved and the proposed algorithm is proved to be effective.
王奇,陈航,王英民,苟艳妮. 基于最小二乘的短垂线阵匹配场处理[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39(6): 1355-1362.
WANG Qi, CHEN Hang, WANG Yingmin, GOU Yanni. Matched Field Processing Based on the Least Squares Algorithm for Short Vertical Linear Array. JEIT, 2017, 39(6): 1355-1362.
BAGGEROER A B, KUPERMAN W A, and MLKHALEVSKY P N. An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1993, 18(4): 401-424. doi: 10.1109/48.262292.
[2]
KUPERMAN W A. An overview of beamforming, matched-field processing, and time reversal techniques[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016, 139(4): 2081. doi: 10.1121/1.4950176.
[3]
DONG H, BADIEY M, and ChAPMAN R. Matched mode geoacoustic inversion of broadband signals in shallow water [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 137(4): 2390. doi: 10.1121/1.4920698.
LUO Xinyu, LI Jian, ZHOU Defu, et al. Simulation studies of the matched-mode processing for locating underwater sound sources[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 2016, 35(2): 172-178. doi: 10.11684/j.issn.1000- 310X.2016.02.012.
[5]
HARRISON B F, VACCARO R J, and TUFTS D W. Robust broadband matched-field localization: Results for a short, sparse vertical array [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999, 106(1): 515-517. doi: 10.1121/1.427072.
[6]
GEMBA K L, HODGKISS W S, and GERSTOFT P. Single and multiple snapshot compressive matched field processing [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 138(3): 1928. doi: 10.1121/1.4934072.
PENG Shui, YUAN Rong, and XU Guogui. Localization performance of different horizontal hydrophone array shape for matched field processing in shallow sea[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2015, 37(9): 121-126. doi: 10.3404/j.issn. 1672-7649.2015.09.024.
[8]
TABRIKIAN J, KROLIK J L, and MESSER H. Robust maximum-likelihood source localization in an uncertain shallow-water waveguide[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997, 101(1): 241-249.
[9]
MICHALOPOULOU Z H and PORTER M B. Matched-field processing for broad-band source localization[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1996, 21(4): 384-392. doi: 10.1109/48. 544049.
[10]
ORRIS G J, NICHOLAS M, and PERKINS J S. The matched-phase coherent multi-frequency matched-field processor[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000, 107(5): 2563-2575. doi: 10.1121/1.428644.
[11]
WILSON G R, KOCH R A, and VIDMAR P J. Matched mode localization[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988, 84(1): 310-320. doi: 10.1121/1.396987.
[12]
YANG T C. A method of range and depth estimation by modal decomposition[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987, 82(5): 1736-1745. doi: 10.1121/ 1.395825.
[13]
TOLLEFSEN D and DOSSO S E. Matched-field source localization with multiple small-aperture arrays[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 138(3): 1754-1754. doi: 10.1121/1.4933543.
[14]
Porter M B and Tolstoy A. The matched field processing benchmark problems [J]. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 1994, 2(3): 161-185. doi: 10.1142/S0218396X94000129.
[15]
YANG T C. Data-based matched-mode source localization for a moving source[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014, 135(3): 1218-1230. doi: 10.1121/1.4863270.
ZHAO Yongjun, ZHAO Yongsheng, and ZHAO Chuang. Single-observer passive DOA-TDOA location based on regularized constrained total least squares[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(9): 2336-2343. doi: 10.11999/JEIT151379.
[17]
WU H, CHEN S, ZHANG Y, et al. Robust structured total least squares algorithm for passive location[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(5): 946-953. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2015.00103.
[18]
GOLUB G H and VAN LOAN C F. An analysis of the total least squares problem[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1980, 17(6): 883-893. doi: 10.1137/0717073.
WANG Qi, WANG Yingmin, and GOU Yanni. Robust conditional probability constraint matched field processing[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2014, 36(10): 2425-2430. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2014.00027.
